Talk:Religious broadcasting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kkowalik. Peer reviewers: KenniCam.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled][edit]

The list of links is long, and not clearly justified. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A red link is based on the info of.....[edit]

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=religious+politics&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en --222.64.26.62 (talk) 02:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more non-Christian information[edit]

The article is very heavily biassed towards Christian broadcasters (like 100%). I've added a few others, but don't know the field; maybe others can make the article more general? Pol098 (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Religious broadcasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. television and radio Section lacks Diversity in Language[edit]

The U.S. section not only lacks diversity in types of religious broadcasts, but in language as well. For example, some common Spanish language, christian networks are AlmaVision, FamiliaTV, and Iglesia Jemir. To have an accurate list of religious broadcasting in the United States there would need to be a comprehensive list divided by religion and language. NikkiBarraza (talk) 04:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Critique of article for Mass Com Course[edit]

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?

Almost every fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. When you are trying to write something based on a certain topic, you must give information from honest sources that can be used for research and must be cited with a link to the title of the article, date, and author. Blogs and social media sources are not acceptable due to lack of information and a 50/50 chance of them being true. Kkowalik (talk) 02:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article is not neutral. There are claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position because most of the paragraphs or main issues that talk about religious broadcasting doesn't even have a properly cited source so it's hard to determine where the sentence came from. Kkowalik (talk) 02:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Religious broadcasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Religious_broadcasting&oldid=1207914034"