Talk:Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc

Isn't this article misleading as the court case is not actually over and the banks have appealed the courts to look further into "part 1" of the test case?

It is only misleading if it states otherwise than that the case is not over. The first judgement has been handed down. The article explains this

The section about "Stephen Hone" is nonsense. He was at the time a self-publicist with a company charging people to bring these claims (hence him putting his name on here). But the OFT case had absolutely nothing to do with him. No references to him on internet or OFT website or in case judgments — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.0.123 (talk) 14:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update and questions[edit]

The UKSC judgment appears to bring an end to the saga. What does everyone think? If it had been Lord Bingham and Lord Steyn from DGFT v First National, do you think the case would have gone the same way? What would have happened if the unplanned overdraft fees could have been assessed for fairness? Wik idea 12:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have recieved a refund of Bank Charges although I had no idea this was happening untill I recieved a letter from my Bank, can they withhold the refund to pay off an overdraft on another account ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.210.124 (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]