Talk:Ultra-royalist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Grammar:
(on one hand, a Peer Chamber composed of hereditary members, on the other hand, a Chamber of Deputies elected under a heavily restricted census suffrage, which permitted approximatively to a 100,000 Frenchmen to vote).

Corrected to:
which permitted approximatively 100,000 Frenchmen to vote

Blueguy76 19:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ideology of the ultra-royalists[edit]

Ultra-royalists were regarded as the far right at the time. The Cambridge Companion to Constant by Helena Rosenblatt further supports this description. Their support for conservatism changed with the elections of 1827 and this shouldn't have been removed either. The movement was primarily reactionary. 83.128.99.144 (talk) 06:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While the prior version in question already had "far-right" in the description of their position, whether they're "right-wing to far right" or "far right" isn't something I feel qualified to judge (and you may be right). The only reason I reverted it was because you were removing a reference. jp×g 06:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't intend to remove sources. I will try to restore those, the part about conservatism did have 2 sources. I will try to restore the previously added sources. 83.128.99.144 (talk) 06:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, according to several french sources the movement was on the right-wing and it was especially not united and divided into various factions. The elections of 1827 ranked nothing in relation to conservatism. The movement split in two with a trend led by Villèle and an extremist trend led by La Bourdonnaye. Tan Khaerr (talk) 00:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]