Talk:Special routes of U.S. Route 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former US Route 1A's?[edit]

Most of the routes in the section on former alternates belong in the U.S. Route 1A article instead. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Though I question why US 1A needs a special page when its a bannered route of US 1, I have no issue someone moving the former alt routes from here to it. --WashuOtaku (talk) 15:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's really not a bannered route of US 1. It's actually a suffixed route. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 20:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It appears no action was taken despite the argument it should move over a year ago, which I believe should be opposite. There are several US Highways that use interchangeably the "Alt" banner or "A" suffix. It still means alternate despite how its presented. --WashuOtaku (talk) 04:44, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 1 Connector (Augusta, Georgia)[edit]

According to Rand McNally's online mapping page, there is a U.S. Route 1 Connector listed on the 5th Street bridge in Augusta, Georgia (just northwest of the Gordon Highway bridge). Is that true? Or is that some kind of error in their mapping? If it is true, could it be added to this list? Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 03:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South Carolina has a bunch of connectors like that (as a way to keep them as primary state highways); [1] confirms that it is one (see page 14). Does it belong on this list? I don't know.
Incidentally, I wouldn't use Rand McNally's online maps as a source for route numbers any more than I'd use any other unofficial online map. --NE2 04:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe it is worth mentioning every connector route there is in South Carolina; there are a lot, nearly all are unsigned (existing only on small sign posts or state maps) and most are short spurs. I don't believe we should make an effort unless it is significant to some degree or at least signed; which, by the way, the US 1 Conn is not at the location. --WashuOtaku (talk) 04:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bannered routes of U.S. Route 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actual route of Alternate US 1 in DC[edit]

This article lists what Google Maps depicts. However, some maps, and the signage in the district itself, direct Alternate US 1 south along US 50 west (New York Avenue) instead of sending it southwest independently, as described here. Do we have a better source for the route? Google imagery showing actual signage: https://www.google.com/maps/@38.917371,-76.9712871,3a,75y,272.96h,77.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3p8VJe2FmqfbHe1FCpg-SA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9181247,-76.9718854,3a,75y,214.68h,85.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sX-bWLXGC3kpgYrG8gj4jdw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Famartin (talk) 07:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC) Pinging User:Viridiscalculus.[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bannered routes of U.S. Route 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Split request[edit]

This page is getting too long and it should be split. --2600:1700:6180:6290:7D89:F761:BBA0:74D1 (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is already two articles covering Special routes of U.S. Route 1, this one and U.S. Route 1A. What do you propose we should do? --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:59, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
One with existing routes and former routes 2600:1700:6180:6290:7D89:F761:BBA0:74D1 (talk) 01:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]