Talk:Sertanejo music

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Brazil: Arts Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Latin music High‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Music/Music genres task force

Sertanejo music is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles

Untitled[edit]

I'm thinking the first/second/third "was" means to say "era" (first era, second era, etc.). Era is the past tense of "to be" (eu era = I was), and it may have been translated as "was". 98.250.132.212 (talk) 19:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a big mistake here. Música Caipira redirects to Música Sertaneja, but they are two very diferent things. Música Caipira is folk music, and is not, by any means, to be confounded with Música Sertaneja. Música Caipira is typical of Southeast and Center Brazil, or the whole São Paulo Estate and parts of Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and also Paraná, where the common folk is designated caipira, a kind of hillbilly, with brazilian indian blood, or, at least, spirit. Sertaneja, from Sertão, outback or badlands, is a toponymic more properly aplied to those from Northeast Brazil. Música Sertaneja, albeit may rightly claim origins in the Música Caipira, is more recent and more urbanite, redneck, rather than hillbilly, so to speak. Caipira music comes from the caipira's soul, and he sings to release his feelings, sings to himself: it only natural. Sertanejo allways sings to be heard, many times too loudly, and to sell his records.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.48.60.10 (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As an English speaker, I find this article quite difficult to understand. 11 Nov 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.97.78.143 (talk) 04:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article features the translation of brazilian local jargon such as "sertanejo" and "caipira" into american english jargon "hillbilly" and "redneck", which confuses the foreign reader rather than helping, and adds misinformation. Those terms should remain untranslated, since they are regional terms for regional peculiarities. Also, there is no point in mentioning the northeast culture of Brazil, unless it is done only to disambiguate the meaning of "sertão". There is no such thing as "hillbilly viola". It is called "Viola Caipira", if there is a name in english for it, this is not it.

A clear unbiased distinction between "sertanejo" and "caipira" would also help, but I disagree with the opinion above. Caipira is indeed more folkloric and traditional than Sertanejo, which has a stronger commercial appeal, but no quality judgement should be made here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murelli (talk • contribs) 22:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Random references[edit]

Starting to think about this article and the above comments - random refs

Elizete Ignácio dos Santos. Modernization and its discontents: discourses on the transformation of caipira into sertanejo music. Vibrant, Virtual Braz. Anthr. vol.8 no.1 Brasília Jan./June 2011 [1] [2]
Making Samba: A New History of Race and Music in Brazil. Marc A. Hertzman. [3] pages 103-111
The Mystery of Samba: Popular Music & National Identity in Brazil. Hermano Vianna. pages 82-89
River of Tears: Country Music, Memory, and Modernity in Brazil. Alexander Dent. page 133-135
Latin America 2014. By Robert T. Buckman page 101

FeatherPluma (talk) 02:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal[edit]

Sertanejo universitário is basically a update of the style, including new themes and sounds. Not new style. Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Better title[edit]

Would Sertanejo or perhaps Sertanejo music be a better title? — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 14:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]