Talk:Russia–European Union relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Any support?[edit]

Hello, I know this is random, but I am very sure that there are politicians and citizens who support the fact that Russia should join. Should we include this? (TheGreenwalker (talk) 20:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Putin's recent comments[edit]

Shouldn't Putin's recent comments on EU-Russian relations be mentioned (a union from "Lisbon to Vladivostok" or something like that he said)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.22.211.96 (talk) 00:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions for update[edit]

See for instance [1]--Dans (talk) 21:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo[edit]

What about Kosovo? I mean not mentioning the problem around Kosovo, the bombing of Serbia(FR Yugoslavia at that time) without clearance from the UN Security Council in 1999, supporting the independance of the serbian province of Kosovo (with a ethnical albanian majority), recognition of independance by several EU (not all) and Nato states, not to mention, is simply not professional! If you think that this doesn't affect EU-Russia relations than let me give you a reminder: What did Putin said after bombing Georgia and the recognition of south ossetia, abkhazia afterwards? He said literally, that after the Recognition of Kosovo from the West, the West openend the box of Pandora... Justifying the recognition by russia with the previous rec. of Kosovo by western Countries, as the US, and its slaves (Germany, whose prime-minister is spied out, Uk, France etc.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.100.214.24 (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you're clearly confused. This is an encyclopedia and not the Foreign Office of the EU or something like that. --Wilhelm3 (talk) 10:28, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Why and how is it even in your opinion connected to the topic EU-Russian relations? Could you please explain and give a source for it if you really want it to be included it in this article? --Wilhelm3 (talk) 10:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated ![edit]

Xx236 (talk) 11:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

treffpunkteuropa[edit]

The treffpunkteuropa is addresed to members of the Youth Union, the statement doesn't deserve to be quoted here.Xx236 (talk) 10:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of Russian-EU relations[edit]

Honorable wikipeditors, What do you think of adding a section on the history of Russian-EU relations, divided into several stages of that history? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphabett (talk • contribs) 17:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would make sense. By the way, you sound like someone who is working at an embassy or something. The only thing missing would be if you said something like "avails himself of this opportunity of assuring the wikipeditors of his highest consideration" at the end 😅 --Wilhelm3 (talk) 10:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Russia–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Russia–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Russia–European Union relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New short paragraphs are being created[edit]

I think a lot has to be done in the article in order to meet the usual Wikipedia standards.

For one, a paragraph was added that describes how Russia helped Italy. It is certainly very commendable, but it should be clear that this does not deserve a paragraph in itself and I would also argue that it belongs in the article "Russian-Italian relations". At the very least it should be put into perspective by including it in a paragraph that is not just describing an one-off incident. Secondly, there is the paragraph, Anti-Russian propaganda and conspiracy theories, which is an incorrect title because it is actually just about one polish conspiracy theory about plane that crashed near Smolensk. Therefore I would suggest to make a paragraph that deals generally with propaganda and to move this as well as the other paragraf "Putin's propaganda" there.

Well, since I suspect that changes to this article are quite controversial, I am now asking on your opinion regarding those points here. Hopefully we can then make this article a bit more uniform, clearer and, above all, a meet the usual Wikipedia standards. --Wilhelm3 (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS. After comparing the article again with for example the one about US-EU relations I would suggest to take the structure there as it is mutch more streamlined in my opinion: 1. History 2. Comparison 3. Trade 4. Cooperation 5. Issues --Wilhelm3 (talk) 10:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, serious reorganization is needed. Kaihsu (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did my best to reorganize. Kaihsu (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Russia–European_Union_relations&oldid=1209906420"