Talk:Roman conquest of the Iberian Peninsula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Date Standardization[edit]

I've noticed that some translators are using BCE and others are using BC or B.C. - we should agree on one to use for the entire article. Any input? --Hobbularmodule 17:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to this link in the WP:MOS, either works. I prefer BCE. - Draeco 23:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

Shouldn't it be Roman conquest of Hispania?

At least Cartaginians, Vandals et al., Visigoths and Muslims also conquered Hispania in different dates (not counting Napoleonic "friendly" invasion of Spain, nor the Reconquista). --Sugaar 22:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The title was inherited from the original version from the Spanish Wikipedia and it seems that the logic is that the name Hispania was exclusively the Roman name for the Iberian Peninsula and thus is only ever used within this context. GringoInChile 16:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, that's debatable. Hispania and Spain are the same etymylogically after all, and Hispania is still its name in Latin. Slac speak up! 07:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name translation[edit]

Some of the names in this article, particularly the "Wars of Conquest" section, need to be translated back into Latin. I'd do it, but I'm not certain of some of the originals. -o is not a masculine nominative ending in Latin: Marco Fulvio should probably Marcus Fulvius, but there should be a nomen as well as a praenomen - e.g. Marcus Fulvius Nobilor. Can anyone help with this? Slac speak up! 07:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umpalumpas?[edit]

Please remove the following?:

"These installations consisting of little people namrd umpalumpas that controlled the world" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Give taker (talk • contribs) 17:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for catching the vandalism. It had been there for more than two weeks. :~( In the future don't hesitate to remove it yourself - we'll all be appreciative! Xymmax (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman conquest of Hispania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Roman conquest of Hispania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roman_conquest_of_the_Iberian_Peninsula&oldid=1194899733"