Talk:Rio de Janeiro (state)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename to "Rio de Janeiro"[edit]

Hi, I'm the co-founder of the project "Subdivisões do Brasil" (Brazilian subdivisions) at Portuguese Wikipedia and the author of more than 5.000 Brazilian location maps (almost all used here). I would like to know why the Brazilian states aticles don't have a higher priority than their respective capitals. Sorry but my capacity to write in English is very limited. What I'm trying to say is: Rio de Janeiro concerns the City of Rio de Janeiro and Rio de Janeiro (state) the state. The same occours with São Paulo (city) and São Paulo (state). I really don't understand why this is the convention and why the states of the USA are different. e.g. New York for the state and New York City for the city / Washington for the state and Washington, D.C. for the city.

I'm proposing that we move "Rio de Janeiro" to "Rio de Janeiro City" and "Rio de Janeiro (state)" to "Rio de Janeiro". Of course, disambiguation notes will be necessary as they are in both Washington and New York.

Raphael.lorenzeto 01:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This would violate the principle of least surprise. When someone types in Rio they expect to get the city, not the state. That is also where the links will all point so we want them to go to the correct article. Rmhermen 15:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This principle of least surprise doesn't apply to Washington and New York? When someone types Washington or New York, they aren't expecting to get the U.S. capital and the big apple? I noticed that exists only two exceptions for naming conventions of brazilian settlements (check talk): "Rio de Janeiro" and "São Paulo". The principle of least surprise applies only to these two cities? The links can be corrected as the time goes. Raphael.lorenzeto 15:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Answered at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements)#Convention for Brazil. --cesarb 00:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to suggest that this discussion be moved to Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements)#Convention for Brazil, since the convention should be the same for both Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, and thus it's better to discuss it at a centralized location. --cesarb 00:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Borders[edit]

Rio de Janeiro is not the only state in the Southeast to share borders with all the other states in the same Southeast macroregion as stated in the article. Minas Gerais would be the other one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.247.48 (talk) 01:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful[edit]

Like this Rio seems amazing! Where are the favelas and other issues? Pfff —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.226.230.37 (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, I should note that this article is about the State of Rio de Janeiro, not the city — as in New York City and the State of New York in the US. The first is within the latter, which is a larger political entity.
Now, assuming you are referring to the images used, note that the images that we can use on Wikipedia are limited by Copyrights. We can only use free material or images that are somehow usable under Fair Use provisions. If you have a free, usable image of a favela and other "issue"-related subjects referring to the State of Rio de Janeiro, consider registering and uploading them at the Wikimedia Commons, which is the common repository of free images for all Wikimedia projects (of which Wikipedia is a part). Thank you for taking an interest. Regards, Redux 23:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rio de Janeiro (state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used in this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The file Rio Bridge.jpg on Wikimedia Commons has been nominated for speedy deletion. View the deletion reason at the Commons file description page. Community Tech bot (talk) 19:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

my you soilder in 2400:AC40:61C:8783:2CC3:41CB:6429:D89 (talk) 09:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]