Talk:Radziwiłł Chronicle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

old talk[edit]

Radziwill Chronicle = Nestor Chronicle (Rauchspur der Raben), german: Gottfried Sturm u.a. (Hrsg.):Rauchspur der Tauben (Radziwill-Chronik).Leipzig, Weimar: Gustav Kiepenheuer Verlag, 1986

name[edit]

"Radzivill Chronicle - according to Unesco". Sounds like a fine name to me. Do we need a national name for this internationally important document? --Irpen 05:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiepdia also uses Radziwiłł family. Why spell a Polish name wrongly? Just to prove we're not Polish? --Doric Loon (talk) 06:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Radziwiłł is not a Polish name, it's a Lithuanian family. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is doesn't make all people that lived there ethnically Polish or ethnically English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.41.117 (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UNESCO[edit]

What does UNESCO have to do with this? No source or citation is given. If the MS is under UNESCO protection, that should be stated, with full details. Otherwise, UNESCO is hardly an authority here, and should be dropped. --Doric Loon (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Miniatures[edit]

Great miniatures - well done whoever got them for us. But, could we please have them properly cited? Manuscript miniatures should be cited with the folio number, for example 123r or 321v. (r for recto, v for verso). And one of the three miniatures does not yet have a caption saying what it shows - somebody lying dying I think... please complete this. Potentially this article could be very nice. --Doric Loon (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]