Talk:Oslo Airport, Fornebu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOslo Airport, Fornebu has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 7, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a Lufthansa Junkers Ju 52 was the first plane to land at Oslo Airport, Fornebu in Norway, nine months before it opened?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 8, 2012, October 8, 2014, October 8, 2017, and October 8, 2022.

Fair use rationale for Image:Luftfartsverket Norway logo.jpg[edit]

Image:Luftfartsverket Norway logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some questions[edit]

  • "... although several German aircraft collided with each other during the landing". Were there any fatalities due to this?
  • "The same year a new commission was established, that in 1957 recommended ... " What was the name of the commission? Were any notable people members here?
  • Geschichte (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • With regards to the first question, even though the field was never blocked there was a battle at Fornebu, which was defended by anti-aircraft machine guns. The first landing attempt was repulsed and the commander of the German landing force was killed. In addition to those killed by Norwegian AA fire there were also fatalities in the landing accidents. I have sources for these things, but as I'm still travelling for another week there will be some time before I can add the details. Manxruler (talk) 23:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

Some of the photos from this Flickr gallery could be useful in this article. Kjetil_r 10:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Fjell[edit]

The article should mention the Kai Fjell murals in the airport's main hall. They were designated as having a special historical value in 2001 by the Norwegian Directorate for Cultural Heritage, and restored in 2007 (Norwegian source). --Kjetil_r 10:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plans for runway expansions[edit]

I'm wondering if there are any references for this

The same year a new commission was established, which in 1957 recommended that the east–west runway be expanded to 3,300 metres (10,800 ft) and the north–south runway to 2,150 metres (7,050 ft)

and also

The ministry then chose to expand the east–west runway to only 2,200 metres (7,200 ft) and leave the north–south runway untouched. The plans would allow the east–west runway to be expanded to 2,800 metres (9,200 ft) in the future, if necessary

The thing is, knowing the area, I just don't see how there would have been room for an expansion of this runway to well over 3000 meter, and even 2800 might have been a bit of a stretch - as in its final incarnation, it pretty much spanned the entire peninsula. This can actually be seen quite clearly in the picture at [1] 81.191.184.223 (talk) 20:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References