This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
There is plenty of notable coverage. This place has been on the food network as well, though I don't have the citation. Tduk (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, the page doesn't meet notability guidelines as coverage doesn't appear to be significant, and attention appears to be only from local media. In addition, the first link is to the commercial website which could be construed to be advertising. Also at this stage, the page contains very little information on why it is any different from the myriad of other icecream shops in the world. I'm happy to let someone else arbitrate, but am confident that as it stands, the article is not suitable for Wikipedia. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 07:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is asserted by this article from The New York Times. CSD A7 does not apply if there is an assertion of notability. If you wish to pursue deletion, feel free to take this article to WP:AFD. Cunard (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
