Talk:Manghud

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mongol Empire task force.

I have added a source as requersted.[edit]

It coincides completely with the information given under the article History of Tajikistan--Mika 22:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mangud, Mangudai and Manghit were all same people who are described in various languages --Enerelt (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manghud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100503005800/http://ansmagazine.com/Spring07/Bukhara to http://ansmagazine.com/Spring07/Bukhara

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Khan[edit]

They took the Islamic title of Emir instead of the title of Khan, since they were not descendants of Genghis Khan and rather based their legitimacy to rule on Islam.

Well this is clearly not true and seems to be inserted POV. "Khan" is just a title meaning chief and is used by many Non-Chinggised and Non-Mongol people in Afghanistan, Iran and the Indian-Subcontinent. I believe this should be removed. Akmal94 (talk) 02:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]