This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
List of princes of Zeta is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I propose merging Principality of Zeta into List of princes of Zeta. They essentially both duplicate the same list of princes. This list is older and more elaborate, but has no sources. The Principality article has good sources (although barely uses them), but has very few details and isn't really a "former state" article. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 02:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I don't have a strong preference either way, as long as they are merged. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This article should be merged into Principality of Zeta. Since both articles are short, they could become a single, longer one. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nederlandse Leeuw, since nobody has opposed the merger in almost 4 months, you can do the merger. See WP:MERGING on how to do that, if you have not done mergers before. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do I have to? I prefer to let someone more experienced take care of it. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If so you should ask an admin to take a look or ask for a close there. Otherwise it is likely nobody will notice this merger proposal, as has happened with others in the past. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
