Talk:International security

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Human security[edit]

I have edited the section on human security in this article. I felt that this article did not previously provide an accurate and sufficient representation of human security, particularly in comparison to that of traditional security. The human security section has been amended with a view to providing a better description of human security and how it differs from the traditional, national approach to security. Part of this amendment involved removing the references to Canada which (nothwithstanding the fact that Canada is one of the primary supporters of human security principles) I believed were excessive and unnecessary, particulary given the brevity of the section. Timschocker (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems in international security worth mentioning.[edit]

1.) Security services have access to information that other individuals do not have.
2.) Criminal activity as defined by law moves through all sectors of society, including security services.
3.) Invasion of privacy for alleged national security allows the gathering of information in such a manner that misuse and abuse of personal information becomes rampant.

A current common place scenario:

M.Security: ´He made a statement I don´t like´,
M.Security_Invader_of_Privacy: ´I don´t like him on moral grounds´, (Religion, behavior, third party innuendo, etc)
M.Con_in_Security: ´They don´t like him, if we target him the security services won´t do a thing´,
M.Media: ´Criminal elements defined as terrorist broke the bank, 100,000 affected´,
M.Security: ´He/they had what was coming to him/them.´
M.Security_Invader_of_Privacy: ´True, we have the morally gathered moral proof.´

How will International security counter criminality originating from those that are alleged to workin international security and nominated as homegrown ´terrorism´. IE: United Nations, United States.

There are sufficient articles related to these affairs implying that ´alleged international security´ has become a simple aka for state sponsored criminality, laisez fair, in the name of international security.(Fractalhints (talk) 13:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Placing Liberal Security under Traditional Security?[edit]

Human security is a concept established by Liberal Security. Traditional security should refer to realist principles of security where as contemporary principles of security refers to Liberal security. Humanitarian security is established under institutions (institutions are fundamentally liberal) such as R2P, created by the UN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.8.213 (talk) 03:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Placing Liberal Security under Traditional Security?[edit]

Human security is a concept established by Liberal Security. Traditional security should refer to realist principles of security where as contemporary principles of security refers to Liberal security. Humanitarian security is established under institutions (institutions are fundamentally liberal) such as R2P, created by the UN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.8.213 (talk) 03:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on International security. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:International_security&oldid=1195051550"