Talk:Gotta Get Thru This (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Gottagetthruthissingle.jpg[edit]

Image:Gottagetthruthissingle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gotta Get thru This (song) → Gotta Get Thru This (song) –

No doubt. See Right Thru Me, Talk:Right Thru Me#Move and Gotta Get Thru This. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 10:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Album recorded with what software?[edit]

I've made edits to this page as well as the Daniel Bedingfield main article page to request a citation for the brand of software Bedingfield used to record his first album. On this page, it is alleged that he used the Reason Audio Recording Software, while on the main article page, it is supposed that he used the Making Waves Audio Recording Software. We need some clarification on this discrepancy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolenjack (talk • contribs) 21:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soundonsound reckon it was Making Waves http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/aug02/articles/makingwaves.asp

- Jesse — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.93.119.125 (talk) 11:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added a primary source citation to this article; feel free to update the main article page as necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.149.101 (talk) 03:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The model is possibly inaccurate[edit]

The article states that the director of the video "cast[ed] a red-haired American dancer named Gina". However [http://www.lindzi.com/interviews/daniel.htm this source states that Gina is actually the inspiration for the song "It's about this flaming red-head from New Jersey, called Gina. I was passionately in love with her and I wanted to be with her, but didn't have the guts to."

Unless they're both the same person, or it's a coincidence.

--10:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougbast (talk • contribs)

Requested move 3 December 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus is against moving. Additionally, these songs do not seem related, so they should be nominated individually. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 22:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


– The diambiguation page doesn't help in any of these cases. Primary topics and hatnotes exist for a reason when it comes to WP:TWODABS. Whilst the page view statistics make it blatantly obvious that the song "Ridin' Solo" is far more notable than the album,[1][2] the page views for the other pairs are closer together. However, the song "Gotta Get Thru This" charted higher on the singles charts than its parent album did on the albums charts of all countries (except Denmark), and likewise, the only place the album Evacuate the Dancefloor made the top 10 was in the UK (number 8, to be precise), whilst the song was a major hit all over the world and has Gold and Platinum certifications in seven countries. Unreal7 (talk) 22:35, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose all anyone using a mobile will be grateful for being given the choice rather than having to load the entire article to find it is the wrong one. And not just mobile users, anyone using the drop down menu. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • My votes on all three titles:
    Oppose changing "Gotta Get Thru This" pages: neither the song nor the album is more significant than the other. Although the stats say that the song is more viewed in last 90 days, look at day-by-day basis. The average number of views per day for the song is 41.48889; the album, 30.62222. The song is 35% more popular than the album, more like more than one third. However, both the album and the song lost viewership as time went by.
    The song "Ridin' Solo" should be the primary topic. The viewership is too tremendous and beats out the album by unrelated singer.
    Oppose changing "Evacuate the Dancefloor" pages: neither the album nor the song is more significant and popular than the other. The numbers are very close to each other. The difference between them is too small to deem one primary.
This should never have been merged into all. Separate discussions should have done a better job than this multi-move. George Ho (talk) 22:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural oppose each pair should be discussed separately, as issues concern each pair are not applicable to other pairs -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gotta Get Thru This (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gotta_Get_Thru_This_(song)&oldid=1207352376"