Talk:Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateFourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleFourth Amendment to the United States Constitution has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 19, 2013Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2014Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Suggested edit to "Plain view and open fields" section[edit]

·       Please consider adding the following paragraph at the end of the Plain view and open fields section:


Moreover, several state courts have rejected the open fields doctrine under their own state constitutional search-and-seizure provisions. [Proposed cites: See, e.g., Faulkner v. State, 98 So. 691 (Miss. 1924); State v. Bullock, 901 P.2d 61 (Mont. 1995); People v. Scott, 593 N.E.2d 1328 (N.Y. 1992); State v. Dixson, 766 P.2d 1015 (Or. 1988); Welch v. State, 289 S.W. 510 (Tenn. 1926); State v. Kirchoff, 587 A.2d 988 (Vt. 1991); State v. Johnson, 879 P.2d 984 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994).] Lyrical42 (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]