Talk:Cor Caroli

Regarding the proposed name change to Alpha CVn:

It seems this proposal was never added to Wikipedia:Requested moves, and it was not added to this talk page either. So I have removed the notice from the article page.

Two points:

First, for consistency with Tau Ceti, Alpha Centauri, etc. we would need to make the name Alpha Canum Venaticorum, and not Alpha CVn.

Second, I normally strongly support using Bayer designations for article titles of star names because in most cases the traditional names are either completely obscure or non-unique or have multiple spellings and so forth. However, in a few cases the traditional name is indeed the most commonly used name (Vega, Capella, Arcturus, Polaris, etc) and Cor Caroli is one such case, perhaps because of the unwieldy multisyllabic length of "Alpha Canum Venaticorum". The name "Chara" on the other hand is mostly unknown in English. So in this case, applying the general Wikipedia principle of using common names, the most appropriate page title is Cor Caroli.

-- Curps 04:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that "Chara", confusingly, can refer to either Alpha or Beta Canum Venaticorum. -- Curps 23:32, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be unsure whether the name is in honour of Charles I or celebrates Charles II's restoration. I added a brief description here why there's an uncertainty and changed some other pages to say I and II. (One page said I, the other said II)--86.130.147.16 22:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Sunspots"[edit]

Shouldn't the word "sunspots" be changed to "starspots," in the paragraph discussing the magnetic field? Actually, it might be nice to just change the meaning of "sunspots" to include "starspots." Broolaf2 23:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Combined magnitude[edit]

"Cor Caroli is a binary star which has a combined apparent magnitude of +2.89". This statement seems inaccurate. If the primary is of +2.89 and secondary of +5.5, the combined magnitude of the pair should be slightly brighter. Pomona17 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cor Caroli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090929163750/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_c_d.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_c_d.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cor Caroli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704215122/http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/corcaroli.html to http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/corcaroli.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

binary or optical double?[edit]

If they are six light-years apart … —Tamfang (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doublestar[edit]

Cor Caroli is a Doublestar. The other Star is namet since 08/15/2021 Arbresha. [1]https://software.space-registry.org/registry/CX11982UK 143.178.168.2 (talk) 21:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to the IAU.Skeptic2 (talk) 21:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And why it is written down there? Maybe you are able to help out as you know it better. Did you check out the link there?

Thank you in advance 2001:A62:4EC:BA01:44C7:B2D6:7CB8:2BB2 (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]