Talk:Cineworld Glasgow
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This is a wiki entry for a first year university project, the page will be updated with relevant information on the subject. Please do not Mark for deletion.
- If it meets deletion criteria it will be deleted - marked or not. Your prof must have read WP:SUP first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- why would this meet deletion criteria? The page was marked for deletion after 3 minutes of creation. Just curious ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ross.gallagher27 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- First, it fails WP:CORP. Second, it's only claim to notability is "the tallest cinema", which is truly weak. Finally, the only third party reliable source was the company's own website, which is not valid as a source. Editors should draft articles in their own userspace, as any "live" article is subject to all the policies and regulations - it's not a test place, and should never be used for such things as school projects. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
'tallest cinema' is very far from being 'weak'! Behave yourself. --78.101.62.79 (talk) 10:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
COI[edit]
As a result of the conflict of interest demonstrated by the discussion on this talk page, I've placed a COI tag; there has been a lot of promotional material and a lot of unencyclopaedic material. This could use a good going-over by some uninvolved editors, I think. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 10:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
I'll make a start. --78.101.62.79 (talk) 10:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, COI tag seems fair enough but our edits might yet render it redundant? --78.101.62.79 (talk) 11:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm you could be right; it's mostly been checked and rephrased and verified now, and the original creators who have the COI haven't edited in a while. The COI problem may have been resolved now. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 11:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've removed it, with the additional changes I don't there are any more COI concerns, and the original editors seem to be long-gone. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 11:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
British English[edit]
Being an article on a cinema in Scotland, should British English be used in this article? I note that there was a comment about a glass elevator (which I removed as being rather irrelevant) which suggested that it had been written in American English. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:10, 4 December 2010 (UTC)