Talk:C-pop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chinese Popular Music[edit]

This article is about Chinese Popular Music. I don't understand why it is entitled "C-pop"? Whereas as K-pop and J-pop are relatively specific styles of music, this article is NOT about NEW Chinese pop music. No one ever called Li Jinhui C-pop. 82.224.103.123 (talk) 12:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and biased statements[edit]

"Recent modern Chinese pop acts often rely heavily on western pop music influences, such that Chinese pop is often described as a 'copycat' version of western pop." - This statement is not reliable at all without a source so I had it removed. Chorus chord patterns from Chinese pop songs generally follow a similar chord pattern, unlike English pop songs which do not have a similar chord pattern during the chorus. --218.186.9.3 04:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only mandopop and cantopop?[edit]

I propose we change the text to "two major subcategories". There is c-pop in other dialects, too. I understand that most of Taiwanese pop is not C-pop but that does not mean there are not others. For example, 伍家辉 is Malaysian and sings Hokkien songs, which I classify as C-pop. Also, Taiwanese group 五月天 has Taiwanese songs that are nothing like enka but more like C-pop. Kltiger (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Los angeles[edit]

Based on what are we saying LA is a hub for c-pop (as of 2008)? Benjwong (talk) 16:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sammi Cheung - Careful Lady.ogg[edit]

The image Image:Sammi Cheung - Careful Lady.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Print references[edit]

For future use:

  • Baranovitch, Nimrod (2003). China's New Voices: Popular Music, Ethnicity, Gender, and Politics, 1978 – 1997. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-23450-2.
  • Jones, Andrew F. (1992). Like a Knife: Ideology and Genre in Contemporary Chinese Popular Music. Cornell East Asia Series. Vol. 57. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-939657-57-0.
  • Jones, Andrew F. (2001). Yellow Music: Media Culture and Colonial Modernity in the Chinese Jazz Age. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-2694-9.

Arsonal (talk) 23:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discarding of proper nouns[edit]

Is this a trend in Wikipedia? Mainland China --> mainland China, Simplified Chinese --> simplified Chinese, and now cantopop and mandopop. How about saying china and taiwan next time? Sounds cool doesn't it? 116.14.163.124 (talk) 08:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Google? Really?[edit]

This article talks about "Google Piracy continues to exist in China[6] but Google have since announced a cooperation deal offering free listening and genuine music copies" and "Google mp3 became available in March 2009.[8]". Google is banned in mainland China. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.63.9.167 (talk) 01:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronism[edit]

It looks REALLY anachronistic to call some Chinese musician from the early 20th century to be a pop icon of "C-Pop". This article is not describing something, rather creating it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.182.61.88 (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on C-pop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on C-pop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]