Talk:Bongbong Marcos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 May 2023[edit]

He did not win by a landslide. This is biased speech right in the opening paragraph and is not supported by the source. I understand that Pope administered nations are preferred to have dictators as the leadership (see Spain), but this doesnt mean you can just use Orwellian speech.95.171.194.45 (talk) 04:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



}} 95.171.194.45 (talk) 04:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


}} 95.171.194.45 (talk) 04:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: What wording would you prefer? Landslide seems pretty reasonable as per the source he got 30.8 million votes with the runner up receiving 14.7 million. Cannolis (talk) 05:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 June 2023[edit]

Please add the template by using "Redirect" template: "Bongbong" redirects here. For other uses, see Bongbong (disambiguation).

Thank you. Guyrichtheman (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has already been done by someone else. Howard the Duck (talk) 12:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 August 2023[edit]

Request to change "at five to 13 billion dollars" in introduction to "at 5 to 13 billion dollars" for number consistency Placeholderer (talk) 20:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 21:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 September 2023[edit]

I want to make an edit request for correction and academic purposes. Mendozawella (talk) 12:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  BelowTheSun  (TC) 12:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kleptocrat and dictator not sourced[edit]

Remove "kleptocrat and dictator" from leade paragraph. Not WP:NPOV 207.96.32.81 (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: That isn't what WP:NPOV means. The first sentence in the policy states: neutral point of view [...] means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Reliable sources call Ferdinand Marcos a kleptocrat and dictator, and so that is what is written here. Tollens (talk) 20:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources? President is an agreed on all reliable sources. This is clearly WP:BIAS207.96.32.81 (talk) 23:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you've read the essay you linked to as it's not relevant to the discussion at hand. XeCyranium (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what a lot of rubbish,Estate Tax has nothing to do with beneficiaries, go and read the rules before open your mouth ! 2A00:23C7:8E00:DC01:4C78:D48A:ABFB:9A71 (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]