Talk:Bombyliidae

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Mid‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Distribution[edit]

Someone like to add something on it. Tsinfandel (talk) 22:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found a couple in England[edit]

2 in the front garden in a small town called Crewe 2.96.57.115 (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Beewhal" citation needed[edit]

The sentence, "In parts of East Anglia, locals refer to them as beewhals, thanks to their tusk-like appendages." seemed a little suspicious to me. Although the term does seem to get occasional use, I don't see anything offhand online predating its addition to this article on 2013-01-08, and so I wonder if it was coined or first recorded as a protologism right here. Ardric47 (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was evidently coined here, so it gets deleted now, unless someone can find an actual citation that pre-dates 2013. Dyanega (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since someone just tried to post "sources" for the name, I'll note again that sources created AFTER January of 2013 appear to be taking the putative name from Wikipedia. I will further note that the person who originally added it here was a repeat vandal, who was blocked from editing Wikipedia shortly after posting it, and who never provided a source for the claim. That the claim sat uncited in Wikipedia for over 10 years is an embarrassment. Dyanega (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]