Talk:Birdy (singer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Just a note: although Debrett's lists Miss van den Bogaerde's Christian names as 'Jasmine Lucilla Elizabeth Jennifer', she is credited as a songwriter as 'Jasmine Lucilla Elisabeth (note the different spelling) van den Bogaerde'. Just including this for completeness's sake! Ashiyura (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Birdy (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archive 1 successful, archive 2 needed an older version due to yearly festival changes.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 19:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Page view statistics show that the majority of page views for topics named "Birdy" is this article. Notice that the disambiguation page currently at the base title gets quite a number of views? This means that we are inconveniencing many readers by sending them to the disambiguation page when most of them are looking for the singer. Over half of the results of a search of "birdy -wikipedia" on DuckDuckGo are about the singer. sst✈ 10:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Yeah why not. I don't think any of the other targets will suddenly acquire much significance. Nohomersryan (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Clear primary topic. Unreal7 (talk) 17:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose doesn't pass either part of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC test. Why make life difficult for users? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And again this template is in the wrong place. Done like this it guarantees alerts go only related to this article making a selective call on pop music editors not to editors working on the rest of the encyclopedia. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize that a bot places a message on the other talk page, right? SSTflyer 09:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SSTflyer (talk · contribs) do you know what an alert is? See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Disambiguation/Article_alerts : because of the way you have set up this RM template, "Birdy" doesn't show on alerts. Also you haven't placed messages on all the other affected pages. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you don't like the fact that the alerts of WikiProject Disambiguation do not show the RMs does not mean that I should deprive the (more numerous) editors of projects like WP:BIOG WP:MUSICIANS WP:WOMEN etc. of RM notifications. Placing RMs on disambiguation pages reduces discussion participation. SSTflyer 16:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose recognizing a teen singer as the primary topic since it is too premature to identify long-term significance, especially with "Birdy" (and "Birdie") having pretty common uses. Even The Telegraph has a recent headline, "Birdy: The most famous singer you've never heard of". A primary topic should be absolutely clear-cut. "Inconveniencing" is a pedantic excuse; readers should not be astonished to see that there are many topics under the given term. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 18:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It's a pretty common word, and some of the other Birdy articles on subjects much older than 1996 don't look like they're of little significance. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above - "Birdy" can mean anything and we could be confusing those who don't want the singer, Plus when one searches "Birdy" "Birdy (singer)" is the 2nd result so personally I don't believe we're disadvantaging anyone. –Davey2010Talk 20:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per other oppose arguments above. If I heard the word randomly, the singer is not my first thought (opinion, not policy based).--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Why not? Because precision is good and ambiguity is bad, that's why. Dicklyon (talk) 05:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - per WP:Precision.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  06:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The pageview evidence shows that this is far and away the topic readers are searching for, even in such a crowded field. This article has received over 68% of the page views in the last 90 days, with over 178,000 hits. The second most viewed article is Birdy (Birdy album) at 20,767, and the dab page got 16,782 hits, a LOT for a dab page. When the evidence shows that the vast majority of readers are looking for one thing, we shouldn't throw a roadblock int their way.--Cúchullain t/c 16:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    The singer's current popularity is not enough to reorganize Wikipedia for her fans' sake. Long-term significance is a factor, too, and the term has been utilized in many different ways, both for general use and in the arts. To frame landing on a disambiguation page as some kind of roadblock is disingenuous. The singer does not dominate all other topics under this term in regards to significance. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 19:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, she does. She's been getting 2/3 of the page views for ambiguous topics as far back as the tool will go.[1] And it's not as if she's just suddenly appeared, she's been prominent for over five years. When one subject is this much more prominent than all other subjects combined, sending all readers to a dab page *is* a roadblock. We're sending all readers to a page none of them want, though the evidence suggests a large majority are looking for one topic in particular.--Cúchullain t/c 19:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    The singer is much more likely to be looked up than the other topics, but long-term significance is a factor too: "if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term." I do not find that to be the case, and I find it inappropriate to emphasize so much on only usage. If that were the case, we'd be shifting articles around constantly in the short term. Long-term significance is a necessary criterion for long-term arrangement. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 13:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Birdy (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Birdy (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birdy-2450.jpg to appear as POTD soon[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Birdy-2450.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 15, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-05-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Birdy
Birdy (born 1996) is an English musician, singer and songwriter. She won the music competition Open Mic UK in 2008, at the age of 12, and her debut single, a version of Bon Iver's "Skinny Love", charted all across Europe and Australia. Her self-titled debut album, Birdy, was released on 7 November 2011 to similar success. She has since released two further albums: Fire Within (2013) and Beautiful Lies (2016).Photograph: Harald Krichel
Archive – More featured pictures...

re: cover artist[edit]

I would disagree with Birdy being categorized as a cover artist. While her early hits were covers, the same can be could be said for many artists starting out in their career, or of anyone releasing their albums/songs from Idol type reality shows.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Albums "Ornithology", "Vogelfrei", "Nightbird"[edit]

Hi there! I've just seen that in the category "Career", sub-category "2016-recent" there's a text talking about three digital albums supposedly released by Birdy digitally without publicity. As only reference a link to a YouTube audio video is available. But discussing with many other Birdy-fans off Wikipedia, we believe this is not her but other musicians called "Birdy". We don't have any proofs for that, but it'd be weird for Birdy and her label to release 36 instrumental songs just a couple of months after the release of her studio album "Beautiful Lies" without any notifications to the publicity. There are no sources at all on the Internet prooving that these albums are from Birdy. I appreciate if any experts could take a look at this text passage. Thanks in advance! Holla 92 (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the paragraph you mentioned. The 3 named "albums" are clearly from a different artist. They can be found on Spotify (Ornithology - Album by Birdy | Spotify, Nightbird - Album by Birdy | Spotify, Vogelfrei - Album by Birdy | Spotify). There's a copyright from 2016, but an earlier date of 2001 on two of the albums. Jasmine would have been 5 years old in 2001. The "Birdy" associated with those 3 albums on Spotify is Birdy | Spotify rather than Birdy | Spotify. Steve With A Guid (talk) 20:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs has an RFC[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs has an RFC for the use of radio station/networks' playlists being cited in articles. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Heartfox (talk) 00:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Birdy_(singer)&oldid=1205110895"