Talk:American Bankers Association

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality dispute - ABA President Reels Against Mortgage Brokers on CNBC[edit]

The section reads like a personal rant against Ed Yingling and the financial market in general, not as neutral content appropriate for an encyclopedia article. I'd suggest extensive rewriting by someone familiar with the subject to address the bias, clean up style and tone, and add citations. Or perhaps the section should just be removed altogether. Jacius (talk) 02:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above mentioned article provided no references and was highly subjective. It was removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.43.194.10 (talk) 02:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bankers Association of America?[edit]

Is this the same organization as the one mentioned in the Neil Armstrong article? -- œ 21:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality dispute - Sources[edit]

Most of the sources in this article are from ABA publications (sources 3 a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m; 6; 7; 8; & 9) including their own website. Sources 8 & 9 neither give proof of accuracy from ABA their selves and therefore is not reliable. Sittinonmybumm (talk) 02:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd feel free to rewrite or delete as your best judgement tells you — it's important that the article not be just a promotional piece.842U (talk) 12:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The logo that was uploaded is no longer the ABA logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewimhof (talkcontribs) 20:25, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks close enough if you compare with the one here. If you do not have a newer, please do not delete the old one. Thank you MarB4 •ɯɒɹ• 20:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No references other than AMA's own website[edit]

All of the content comes from the ABA website so I've added the sentence "The American Bankers Association website describes their" to all ref's material until sources from news, journals, reports (not from AMA) can be found. In other wikipedia articles all mention of philanthropy that is referenced only by the article's own website is automatically removed. Does anyone have any valid references for the foundation work etc, acceptable to wikipedia standards?

This is an extremely important Association with a pivotal, far-reaching role in not just American finance but in global finance, that merits a complete, robust description. Currently it reads as if it were a small NGO, an advocate and educator for all things banking while also committed to philanthropy. oceanflynn 15:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Bankers Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]