Talk:Aircraft canopy

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Canopy (aircraft) → Aircraft canopy — Perhaps more appropriate article name, just as specific, better form —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 06:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the move, as uncontroversial. Cheers. -GTBacchus^(talk) 08:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested merger[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Unanimous support. - BillCJ (talk) 02:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bubble canopy and Malcolm Hood → Aircraft canopy

Rationale - All three articles are mostly uncited stubs with galleries. With some additional sources, the merged article would be an good improvement. - BillCJ (talk) 01:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for details on performing mergers.)

Survey[edit]

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons.

Support - Per my nomination. - BillCJ (talk) 01:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yes, makes sense. Must be careful not to bite the creator of Malcolm Hood, I'm surprised that we didn't already have an article on it. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 01:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sounds reasonable to me (wrote the MH article). But, we must be sure that redirects, etc. make it clear that Malcolm Hoods and Bubbles are each subsets of Aircraft Canopies, so that they're not all thought to be the same thing. LP-mn (talk) 02:55, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Previous merger discussion[edit]

It appears that, despite unanimous support, the proposed merger with Bubble canopy and Malcolm hood never took place. Does anyone know why? Nick Number (talk) 18:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some things just slip through the cracks. If I get a chance I'll see what I can do. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]