Talk:2014 Washington, D.C., Initiative 71

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Washington, D.C., Initiative 71 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cannabis Low‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drug Policy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy articles

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Decriminalization of non-medical cannabis in the United States#District of Columbia]] Anchor Decriminalization of non-medical cannabis in the United States#District of Columbia links to a specific web page: Washington, D.C.. The anchor (#District of Columbia) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/dc-legalizes-pot-in-capital-despite-threats-from-congress/2015/02/26/60b133a6-bdac-11e4-9dfb-03366e719af8_story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Cannabis in Washington, D. C., split off, or what?[edit]

Right now almost every single US state and territory has a "Cannabis in X" article for itself, but DC is using this page, Initiative 71, as its main article.

Should we re-name this page to Cannabis in Washington, D.C. and then flesh it out a little bit with mention of other changes and cultural issues outside of just 71, or should we start a brand new page Cannabis in Washington, D.C. and populate it from scratch, or what would be the best way? Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 23:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page should be renamed and within it include info about Initiative 71.Terrorist96 (talk) 23:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think we need Cannabis in Washington, D.C., with a section and main page link to Initiative 71. The DC article should include other info related to culture, other legislation, advocacy group, etc. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely two separate entries. One about the initiative, one about developments on marijuana in DC. I'll add some to the latter once its created. DC has few ballot initiatives, each is deserving of its own entry. Bangabandhu (talk) 04:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I've created Cannabis in Washington, D. C. by recycling some material from existing articles. Please feel free to expand and refine. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 08:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140506051224/http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/04/23/pot-legalizers-hit-dc-streets-to-secure-november-ballot-spot to http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/04/23/pot-legalizers-hit-dc-streets-to-secure-november-ballot-spot

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Initiative 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150228020448/http://dcregs.dc.gov/Gateway/NoticeHome.aspx?NoticeID=4827610 to http://dcregs.dc.gov/Gateway/NoticeHome.aspx?NoticeID=4827610

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]